|
Energy starved African's said to be 'aghast at LIVE EARTH bizarre message' |
|
|
|
Written by Kofi Bent, Accra
|
|
Monday, 23 July 2007 |
|
Few people in Africa got to see Al Gore and his troupe of rock-star ecologists
strutting their stuff two weekends ago, because most have neither television
nor electricity. That's just as well, because they would have been aghast at
Live Earth's bizarre message.
In Africa, we have much more serious things to
worry about than climate change. Indeed, if they achieve their objective the
concerts will have done harm to the people of Africa.
Britain's former Secretary
of State for the Environment, David Miliband, recently said that the rest of
the world cannot aspire to the UK's
standard of living because: "If the world were to have the same living
standards as we have in the UK,
then we'd need three planets to support us." Presumably Mr. Miliband would
disagree with Indira Ghandi, who famously said, "Poverty is the greatest
polluter."
Miliband was replaced by Hilary Benn, who as Minister for International
Development ran the Department for International Development (DfID).
One might have thought that DfID would have supported economic development as a
means of escaping from poverty and pollution. But in its Rough Guide to a
Better World it advocates "Development by Dung" and claims that
"As poor countries develop, it is essential that they do not follow the same
failed patterns of energy use." So it's dung not diesel for Africa - while
India and China soar
ahead because they are too big, and nuclear-armed, to stop.
Even if we accept that global warming may have a significant effect on our
climate, limiting the use of fossil fuels in Africa
would be counterproductive.
Respiratory infections are the leading cause of childhood deaths on my
continent, mainly from inhaling the smoke produced by burning wood and dung in
our quaint mud huts. Why do we burn these "renewable" but very dirty
fuels? Not because we have some desire to save the Earth. No sir! It is because
we don't have access to natural gas or electricity.
The second leading cause of childhood deaths is not malaria or Aids, it is
diarrhoea, caused by drinking dirty water. Why is our water dirty? Mainly
because we lack cheap, efficient means of pumping and cleaning it. That
requires fossil fuels--either directly or to produce electricity.
An underlying cause of many health problems in Africa
is malnutrition. This is a consequence both of inefficient farming and poor
food distribution. To rectify this situation will mean using cheap and
relatively clean fuels, such as gasoline and diesel. (Of course we also need
better roads--which can only be built using machines that burn. fossil fuels.)
Our already poor and struggling countries are being sucked into a giant
movement to save the Earth--with aid money as the carrot and the stick. If we
are cajoled into using more expensive "renewable" forms of energy, we
will remain uncompetitive and our rates of economic growth will remain low or
shrinking.
That would be a tragedy because economic growth has been shown to be the best
way to reduce poverty and improve health.
Please, Europe and America, spare us! You can cut your own emissions if you
want, but don't tell us what to do. We really have much more serious and urgent
threats to deal with. Unfortunately, our beggarly governments are very
susceptible to diktats from on high, especially when they are offered aid (which
they use to line the coffers of their bank accounts): don't encourage them!
Humanity has proven itself hugely adaptable. We survived an Ice Age and a
period probably much hotter than today (around 8,000 years ago). The Dutch
salvaged land from the sea and built on it. In Saudi Arabia, they drink
desalinated sea water. The Tuaregs adapted to the blazing heat of the Sahara
and the Eskimos adapted to the freezing cold of the Arctic.
So why do the pessimists think we won't adapt to another change in climate? Why
are they hyperventilating about what is likely to be a relatively minor
environmental shift? Perhaps they dislike the idea of Africans really
developing. But if global warming is real and does change the climate in Africa, then we will need greater wealth and access to
modern technologies in order to adapt.
Schemes that bar us from those technologies and undermine economic growth will
prevent us adapting to change. What will the ageing politicians and rock-star
ecologists do for us then?
Kofi Bentil is a lecturer at Ashesi University, a business strategy consultant in Accra and winner of the
World Bank "Ghana Development Marketplace" award for
entrepreneurship.
Copyright © 2007 Accra Mail. All rights reserved. Distributed by AllAfrica
Global Media (allAfrica.com). To contact the copyright holder directly for
corrections -- or for permission to republish or make other authorized use of
this material.
|