|
Wednesday, 12 May 2010 12:21 |
|
TESTIMONY OF THE VISCOUNT MONCKTON OF BRENCHLEY BEFORE CONGRESS, MAY 6, 2010
|
|
Last Updated on Wednesday, 12 May 2010 12:30 |
|
Read more... [Testimony of the Viscount Monckton of Brenchley Before Congress, 6 May 2010]
|
|
Written by Marlo Lewis
|
|
Thursday, 22 April 2010 12:17 |
|
The Pentagon is perhaps the most influential lobby on Capitol Hill and has the respect of many on the center-right who hold the likes of Greenpeace, Al Gore, and the United Nations in low regard. What’s more, if “even the generals are worried” and climate change is officially deemed a national security threat, then proponents of cap-and-trade get to wave the flag and depict their opponents as venal, partisan, or unpatriotic. So it’s not surprising that global warming activists for years have sought to institutionalize climate change concerns in Department of Defense (DOD) intelligence assessments, program planning, and budgeting.
|
|
Last Updated on Thursday, 22 April 2010 12:36 |
|
Read more... [The Department of Defense Should Assess the Security Risks of Climate Change Policies]
|
|
Written by James Hall
|
|
Thursday, 22 April 2010 12:05 |
|
Financial scandals are not new. Schemes to leverage risk and cheat the public are mainstays of the mad “Cap and Trade” stratagem, in the ongoing war, against genuine free enterprise. The latest ploy is the industrial wind swindle.
|
|
Last Updated on Thursday, 22 April 2010 12:17 |
|
Read more... [Industrial Wind and the Wall Street Cap and Trade Fund]
|
|
Written by Joseph L. Bast
|
|
Thursday, 22 April 2010 11:54 |
|
The theory of climate change that most people are familiar with is com monly called anthropogenic (man-made) global warming, or AGW for short. That theory holds that man-made greenhouse gases, primarily car bon dioxide (CO2), are the predominant cause of the global warming that occurred during the past 50 years.
|
|
Last Updated on Thursday, 22 April 2010 12:03 |
|
Read more... [Seven Theories of Climate Change]
|
|
Written by Walter Cunningham
|
|
Wednesday, 21 April 2010 17:20 |
|
There is a war going on between those who believe that human activities are responsible for global warming and those who don’t. Contrary to the way the debate is often framed by the media, those who believe in anthropogenic global warming (AGW) do not hold the high ground, scientifically. Their critics do.
|
|
Last Updated on Wednesday, 21 April 2010 17:25 |
|
Read more... [Global Warming, Facts vs. Faith, One Astronaut's Views]
|
|
Written by Dr. Robert E. Stevenson
|
|
Wednesday, 21 April 2010 13:56 |
|
Contrary to recent press reports that the oceans hold the still-undetected global atmospheric warming predicted by climate models, ocean warming occurs in 100-year cycles, independent of both radiative and human influences.
|
|
Last Updated on Wednesday, 21 April 2010 14:04 |
|
Read more... [Yes, the Ocean Has Warmed; No, It's Not 'Global Warming']
|
|
Written by Dr. Willie Soon
|
|
Friday, 16 April 2010 09:35 |
|
PowerPoint slides from Dr. Willie Soon’s Congressional staff briefing held in DC on April 13, 2010.
The paper upon which the briefing was based can be found here: http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/reprint/carbon_myopia.html
Abstract:
In 2007 the Supreme Court commented that “greenhouse gases fit well within the Clean Air Act’s capacious definition of air pollutant.” In this presentation, Dr. Soon will discuss why atmospheric CO2 is not an “air pollutant”. Three points of discussion will be: (1) CO2 is not an air pollutant, (2) Ocean acidification claims are exaggerated, (3) The magical CO2 control knob idea “to save the world” is essentially dead.
|
|
Last Updated on Friday, 16 April 2010 09:57 |
|
Read more... [PowerPoint slides from Dr. Willie Soon’s Congressional staff briefing held in DC on April 13, 2010]
|
|
Written by Ross McKitrick
|
|
Wednesday, 07 April 2010 05:36 |
|
This is the story of how I spent 2 years trying to publish a paper that refutes an important claim in the
2007 report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The claim in question is not just
wrong, but based on fabricated evidence. Showing that the claim is fabricated is easy: it suffices merely
to quote the section of the report, since no supporting evidence is given. But unsupported guesses may
turn out to be true. Showing the IPCC claim is also false took some mundane statistical work, but the
results were clear. Once the numbers were crunched and the paper was written up, I began sending it to
science journals. That is when the runaround began.
|
|
Last Updated on Wednesday, 07 April 2010 06:08 |
|
Read more... [Circling the Bandwagons: My Adventures Correcting the IPCC]
|
|
Written by Willie Soon & David Legates
|
|
Tuesday, 06 April 2010 12:26 |
|
In December 2009, lawmakers and representatives from around the world,
along with scientists, numerous journalists, and various celebrities flew to
Copenhagen, Denmark. For the most part, their goal was to promote a
regulatory scheme aimed at controlling human carbon emissions by declaring
the element a tradable commodity and establishing laws and regulations to
govern the trade.
The proposed regulations were premised on the flawed notion, articulated
by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC),1
that increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations will change
climate dramatically and thereby cause major ecological and economic damage.
|
|
Last Updated on Tuesday, 06 April 2010 12:31 |
|
Read more... [Avoiding Carbon Myopia: 3 Considerations for Policy Makers Concerning Man-Made Carbon Dioxide]
|
|
|