Reprint
Of Elephants and Mouseholes E-mail
Written by James Valvo   
Thursday, 17 February 2011 14:23

Summary: The Obama administration is rapidly promulgating greenhouse gas regula tions under the Clean Air Act, something it was arguably never designed to do. This series of regulations is fraught with difficulties as the Environmental Protection Agency is trying to redefine several provisions of the Act in order to apply them to greenhouse gases. This Working Paper examines the possibilities that the EPA could resurrect cap-and-trade as either best available control technology for prevention of significant deterioration permits or as the standard of performance under the new source performance standard program. In order to use either of these provisions to enact a greenhouse gas cap-and-trade program, EPA will have to find “an elephant in a mousehole.” The Paper also includes a discussion of how cap-and-trade would help EPA accomplish emission reduction goals that cannot be effectively pursued under a traditional application of the Clean Air Act.



Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Free and Open Source Software News Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! Twitter! Joomla Free PHP
Last Updated on Friday, 18 February 2011 10:51
Read more... [Of Elephants and Mouseholes]
 
Demarketing Alberta E-mail
Written by Vivian Krause   
Thursday, 17 February 2011 14:15

Last week, Michael Ignatieff and 142 other Members of Parliament voted in favour of a motion to ban oil tanker traffic on the north coast of British Columbia. This week, Liberal MP Joyce Murray from Vancouver Quadra introduced Bill C-606 to put that motion into law by amending the Canada Shipping Act to prohibit oil tanker traffic on the north and central coast of British Columbia.

Ms. Murray and every single one of those MPs played right into the hands of the U.S. foundations seeking to block oil tanker traffic. Whether intentional or not, these actions will also stop oil exports to Asia. On the surface, this is about oil, Canada's single most important export. More important, this is about the sovereignty of our country, which should be decided by Canadians, not foreign-funded campaigns.



Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Free and Open Source Software News Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! Twitter! Joomla Free PHP
Last Updated on Thursday, 17 February 2011 14:22
Read more... [Demarketing Alberta]
 
A Case Against Precipitous Climate Action E-mail
Written by Dr. Richard Lindzen   
Thursday, 17 February 2011 12:58

The notion of a static, unchanging climate is foreign to the history of the earth or any other planet with a fluid envelope. The fact that the developed world went into hysterics over changes in global mean temperature anomaly of a few tenths of a degree will astound future generations. Such hysteria simply represents the scientific illiteracy of much of the public, the susceptibility of the public to the substitution of repetition for truth, and the exploitation of these weaknesses by politicians, environmental promoters, and, after 20 years of media drum beating, many others as well.



Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Free and Open Source Software News Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! Twitter! Joomla Free PHP
Last Updated on Thursday, 17 February 2011 14:15
Read more... [A Case Against Precipitous Climate Action]
 
Prof. Larry Bell of Forbes, Fires Back at 'RealClimate.org' for their 'Desperate Hit and Run Tactics" against Skeptics Visit Site E-mail
Written by Prof. Larry Forbes   
Thursday, 17 February 2011 12:53

Prof. Larry Bell's Response to RealClimate.org's Alleged “Debunking” of My Forbes Article titled “Hot Sensations vs. Cold Facts” (Bell is author of the new book: "Climate of Corruption: Politics and Power behind the Global Warming Hoax.")



Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Free and Open Source Software News Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! Twitter! Joomla Free PHP
Last Updated on Thursday, 17 February 2011 12:58
Read more... [Prof. Larry Bell of Forbes, Fires Back at 'RealClimate.org' for their 'Desperate Hit and Run Tactics" against Skeptics Visit Site]
 
The Influence of Station Numbers on Temperature Measurement E-mail
Written by Jonathan J. Drake   
Monday, 14 February 2011 15:44

Dan intriguing article regarding the influence of the number of stations on the global temperature measurement has been written by Ross McKitrick and published on his website here: http://www.uoguelph.ca/~rmckitri/research/nvst.html. Looking at his graph, the eye is instantly drawn to the apparent correlation between the stations and temperature.

There is a huge step in the raw mean temperatures around 1990 with a synchronous change in the number of stations. The adjustments and gridding methods employed to create the accepted global temperature records, are reportedly satisfactory to deal with such data aberrations and on visual inspection there is no immediately obvious problem. However, that does not rule out the possibility that the gridded end product contains artefacts of the processing and/or character from the raw data that are not related to climate and that could potentially distort the overall picture. This brief communication describes a method, utilising the dataset from Ross McKitrick and Joe D’Aleo, to calculate a historic temperature record through modelling the relationship between raw mean temperatures and the number of stations.



Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Free and Open Source Software News Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! Twitter! Joomla Free PHP
Last Updated on Monday, 14 February 2011 15:49
Read more... [The Influence of Station Numbers on Temperature Measurement]
 
Is 2010 The Hottest Year Ever? E-mail
Written by Steve Goddard   
Monday, 14 February 2011 14:57

Dr. James Hansen of NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) has announced that 2010 was the “hottest year on record” – by 0.01 degrees. His claim has been widely touted in the press as strong evidence that the climate is rapidly heating – due to human generated CO2 emissions. Dr. Hansen has also stated: "I would not be surprised if most or all groups found that 2010 was tied for the warmest year." But most groups do not support his claim.



Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Free and Open Source Software News Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! Twitter! Joomla Free PHP
Last Updated on Monday, 14 February 2011 15:03
Read more... [Is 2010 The Hottest Year Ever?]
 
In China, the True Cost of Britain's Clean, Green, Wind Power Experiment: Pollution on a Disastrous Scale E-mail
Written by Simon Parry & Ed Douglas   
Wednesday, 09 February 2011 13:33

On the outskirts of one of China’s most polluted cities, an old farmer stares despairingly out across an immense lake of bubbling toxic waste covered in black dust. He remembers it as fields of wheat and corn.

Yan Man Jia Hong is a dedicated Communist. At 74, he still believes in his revolutionary heroes, but he despises the young local officials and entrepreneurs who have let this happen.

‘Chairman Mao was a hero and saved us,’ he says. ‘But these people only care about money. They have destroyed our lives.’

Vast fortunes are being amassed here in Inner Mongolia; the region has more than 90 per cent of the world’s legal reserves of rare earth metals, and specifically neodymium, the element needed to make the magnets in the most striking of green energy producers, wind turbines.

Live has uncovered the distinctly dirty truth about the process used to extract neodymium: it has an appalling environmental impact that raises serious questions over the credibility of so-called green technology.



Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Free and Open Source Software News Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! Twitter! Joomla Free PHP
Last Updated on Wednesday, 09 February 2011 13:38
Read more... [In China, the True Cost of Britain's Clean, Green, Wind Power Experiment: Pollution on a Disastrous Scale]
 
The Truth About Climate Change: An Open Letter to the United States Congress E-mail
Written by SPPI   
Tuesday, 08 February 2011 23:11

On 28 January 2011, eighteen scientists sent a letter to members of the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate urging them to "take a fresh look at climate change." Their intent, apparently, was to disparage the views of scientists who disagree with their contention that continued business-as-usual increases in carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions produced from the burning of coal, gas, and oil will lead to a host of cataclysmic climate-related problems.

We, the undersigned, totally disagree with them and would like to take this opportunity to briefly state our side of the story.



Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Free and Open Source Software News Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! Twitter! Joomla Free PHP
Read more... [The Truth About Climate Change: An Open Letter to the United States Congress]
 
The Unskeptical Guide to the Skeptics Handbook E-mail
Written by Joanne Nova   
Monday, 07 February 2011 12:16

Most of all, the deceptive shell game continues. The Guide offers evidence that supports a direct effect of carbon which amounts to one measly degree if carbon levels double. It offers no evidence that positive feedback will amplify the results up to a wildly high 3 or 4 degrees, and it does not inform readers that there is empirical evidence that the feedback is negative and will thus attenuate that one minor degree. Thus the half-truths are broadcast, but the lies by omission border on deception.



Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Free and Open Source Software News Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! Twitter! Joomla Free PHP
Last Updated on Monday, 07 February 2011 12:26
Read more... [The Unskeptical Guide to the Skeptics Handbook]
 
How Can Climate Scientists Spend So Much? E-mail
Written by Climatequotes.com   
Tuesday, 18 January 2011 13:40

Until a few days ago I knew that the US government spent an excessive amount of taxpayer money on climate change research. It was just a general notion; I had read occasional articles showing the funding of certain agencies like NASA but I didn't know many specifics. Then on New Years Day, I wrote a very quick article where I randomly picked a document from a Google search showing funding for climate change. The numbers astonished me. I decided to take a closer look.



Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Free and Open Source Software News Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! Twitter! Joomla Free PHP
Last Updated on Tuesday, 18 January 2011 13:45
Read more... [How Can Climate Scientists Spend So Much?]
 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>

Page 3 of 19