|
Written by Center for Science and Public Policy
|
|
Sunday, 01 August 2010 20:58 |
|
Critical Comments on EPA’s Proposed National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants; and, in the Alternative, Proposed Standards of Performance for New and Existing Utility Steam Generating Units: Notice of Data Availability (as issued in Federal Register, vol. 69, no. 230, December 1, 2004, 69864-69878)
|
|
Read more... [Critical Comments on the Methodology & Feasibility of the EPA's Proposed "Clean Air Mercury Rule]
|
|
Written by Robert Ferguson
|
|
Saturday, 31 July 2010 13:46 |
|
In this companion to our white paper, How Safe Are We From the Fish We Eat?, we offer a scientific analysis and evaluation of another serious public health scare related to fish consumption using the latest peer-reviewed literature: there is emerging evidence that trace amounts of “mercury” in fish could overwhelm the positive effects of Omega-3 fatty acids, causing cardiovascular disease (CVD), coronary heart disease (CHD) and even death in adults. The “emerging evidence” appears to be based on two highly suspect studies.
|
|
Read more... [Fish, Mercury and Cardiac Health - A Review of the Current Literature]
|
|
Written by Steve McIntyre
|
|
Wednesday, 28 July 2010 16:46 |
|
The word “hide” has obviously attracted a lot of attention lately – “hide the decline” even occasioning its own song.
Today I’d like to discuss the following remarkable instructions by a NASA employee in the recently disclosed NASA emails (available at Judicial Watch): Robert please move to the CU site and hide this after Jim checks it. Darnell please send it out to Jim’s email list. Jim said if I don’t want to you should do…
What is that they are planning to “hide”? And why would they be “hiding” it in the first place? And why would Hansen think that one of his employees wouldn’t “want” to send something out to Jim’s email list?
|
|
Read more... [Nasa: "Hide This After Jim Checks It]
|
|
Written by by Edward J. Wegman, David W. Scott, and Yasmin H. Said
|
|
Monday, 26 July 2010 17:13 |
|
Ad Hoc Committee Report on the Hickey Stick Global Climate Reconstruction.
|
|
Read more... [Ad Hoc Committee Report on the "Hockey Stick" Global Climate Reconstruction]
|
|
Written by Paul Reiter
|
|
Monday, 26 July 2010 17:06 |
|
Present global temperatures are in a warming phase that began 200 to 300 years ago. Some climate models suggest that human activities may have exacerbated this phase by raising the atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases. Discussions of the potential effects of the weather include predictions that malaria will emerge from the tropics and become established in Europe and North America. The complex ecology and transmission dynamics of the disease, as well as accounts of its early history, refute such predictions.
|
|
Read more... [From Shakespeare to Defoe: Malaria in England in the Little Ice Age]
|
|
Written by NIPCC, SEPP and the CEI
|
|
Monday, 26 July 2010 16:57 |
|
Comments on EPA’s “Endangerment” finding.
|
|
Read more... [Petition for Reconsideration to the EPA Regarding GHG Endangerment Finding]
|
|
Written by Nicolas Nierenberg, Walter R. Tschinkel and Victoria J. Tschinkel
|
|
Monday, 26 July 2010 16:51 |
|
The 1983 National Academy of Sciences report entitled Changing Climate, authored by a committee of physical and social scientists chaired by William Nierenberg, was an early comprehensive review of the effects of human-caused increases in the levels of atmospheric CO2. Study of the events surrounding the committee’s creation, deliberations, and subsequent report demonstrates that the conclusions of the report were the consensus of the entire committee and in line with the scientific consensus of the time. This result contraverts a 2008 paper in which Naomi Oreskes, Erik M. Conway, and Matthew Shindell asserted that the report contradicted a growing consensus about climate change, and that Nierenberg for political reasons deliberately altered the summary and conclusions of the report in a way that played down the concerns of the other physical scientists on the committee.
|
|
Read more... [Early Climate Change Consensus at the National Academy: The Origins and Making of "Changing Climate]
|
|
Written by Jeremy Nieboer
|
|
Monday, 26 July 2010 16:41 |
|
JEREMY NIEBOER, member of the Advisory Board of the European Foundation, reviews the present state of scientific opinion on the existence of any abnormal rise in temperature of the planet and the part, if any, that man made emissions of CO2 can with confidence be said to have contributed to it. The four successive reports of the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and the UK’s own Stern Review suggest that climate change may well cause serious loss of global GDP by the end of this century with catastrophic tipping points likely to occur in 10 to 15 years time. However, examination of the evidence for these alarming conclusions indicates that they are riven with deep uncertainties.
|
|
Read more... [A Lesson in Democracy, Comparing the EU and the US Response to Climate Alarmism]
|
|
Written by The Center for Politiske Studier SPPI
|
|
Monday, 26 July 2010 15:47 |
|
Denmark generates the equivalent of about 19% of its electricity demand with wind turbines, but wind power contributes far less than 19% of the Nation’s electricity demand. The claim that Denmark derives about 20% of its electricity from wind overstates matters. Being highly intermittent, wind power has recently (2006) met as little as 5% of Denmark’s annual electricity consumption with an average over the last five years of 9.7%.
|
|
Read more... [Wind Energy The Case of Denmark]
|
|
Written by Barry Brill
|
|
Monday, 26 July 2010 15:40 |
|
In creating the position of Chief Science Adviser (CSA) in May 2009, the Prime Minister commented that “this role is one of vital importance that demands not only a high level of science expertise, but also the utmost integrity to fairly represent the state of science knowledge.” There is no detailed job description, nor any body of precedent, to assist in defining the boundaries of the new position. However, it is clear enough that the role does not extend beyond “science” and that heavy reliance is placed upon the personal expertise of the incumbent.
|
|
Read more... [Prime Minister's Chief Science Adviser and Climate Change]
|
|
Written by Barry Brill
|
|
Monday, 26 July 2010 15:35 |
|
Open Letter To Professor Sir Peter Gluckman Primate Minister's Chief Science Adviser.
|
|
Read more... [Open Letter To Professor Sir Peter Gluckman Prime Minister's Chief Science Adviser.]
|
|
Written by J. Scott Armstrong and Kesten C. Green and Willie Soon
|
|
Monday, 26 July 2010 15:28 |
|
GLOBAL WARMING ALARM BASED ON FAULTY FORECASTING PROCEDURES: COMMENTS ON THE US DEPARTMENT OF STATE'S U.S. CLIMATE ACTION REPORT TH ED.
|
|
Read more... [Global Warming Alarm Based On Faulty Forecasting Procedures]
|
|
Written by Staff
|
|
Monday, 26 July 2010 15:21 |
|
Variations in climate from year to year and decade to decade play a greater role in the Texan climate than any long-term trends. Short-term variability will continue to dominate the climate in future. The Texas climate shows no statically significant long-term trend in mean annual temperature, rainfall, floods, droughts, heatwaves, tornadoes, or hurricanes – still less any trend that could reasonably be attributed to “global warming”.
|
|
Read more... [Observed Climate Change and the Negligible Global Effect of Greenhouse-gas Emission Limits in the State of Texas]
|
|
Written by Staff
|
|
Monday, 26 July 2010 15:14 |
|
There is no observational evidence of unusual long-term climate changes in North Carolina.
The observations we have detailed in this review illustrate that year-to-year and decade-to-decade variability plays a greater role in North Carolina’s climate than any long-term trends. Such short-term variability will continue dominate North Carolina’s climate into the future. At the century timescale, North Carolina’s climate shows no statically significant trend in statewide average annual temperature, statewide total annual precipitation, or in the frequency and/or severity of droughts—an indication that “global warming” is anything but “global” and also strong evidence that local and regional processes are more important than global ones in determining local climate and local climate variations and changes. The same is true for tropical cyclones impacting North Carolina and the United States—there is a great degree of annual and decadal variability that can be traced long into the past, but no 20th century trends in frequency, intensity, or damage. Global sea levels are indeed rising, but they are rising, and should continue to rise, at a pace that is not dissimilar to the pace of rise experienced and adapted to during the 20th century. And climate change is shown to have little, if any, detectable impacts on the overall health of North Carolina’s population. Instead, application of direct measures aimed at combating the negative impacts of heat waves and vector-borne diseases prove far and away to be the most efficient and effective methods at improving the public health.
|
|
Read more... [Observed Climate Change and the Negligible Global Effect of Greenhouse-gas Emission Limits in the State of North Carolina]
|
|
Written by SPPI
|
|
Monday, 26 July 2010 15:06 |
|
In this report, we review the long-term climate history of the United States and find little in the way of evidence that the on-going atmospheric build-up of greenhouse gases (“global warming”) has acted to alter the country’s general climate state. Moreover, what climate changes have occurred over the past century or so have largely been benign (or even positive), have been adapted to, or both.
|
|
Read more... [Observed Climate Change and the Negligible Global Effect of Greenhouse-gas Emission Limits in the United States]
|
|
Written by SPPI
|
|
Monday, 26 July 2010 14:51 |
|
In this report, we review the long-term climate history of Oregon and find little in the way of evidence that the greenhouse gas build-up in the atmosphere has done much to alter Oregon’s climate. While temperatures have generally appeared to have risen slightly across the state over the past 100 years, they have in fact fallen a bit during the past 20 years. The state’s precipitation and drought histories are marked by annual and decadal variability rather than long-term change. Variations in the state’s climate are significantly influenced by natural variations and cycles driven in part by decadal variations in the Pacific atmosphere/ocean system. Future sea level rise will be muted by Oregon’s geologic processes which generally act in opposition to rising oceans by raising the level of the state’s coastlines. Further, scares of increasing tropical diseases are easily shown to be misapplication of the true facts.
|
|
Read more... [Observed Climate Change and the Negligible Global Effect of Greenhouse-gas Emission Limits in the State of Oregon]
|
|
Written by Angelo M. Codevilla
|
|
Wednesday, 21 July 2010 17:36 |
|
Once an official or professional shows that he shares the manners, the tastes, the interests of the class, gives lip service to its ideals and shibboleths, and is willing to accommodate the interests of its senior members, he can move profitably among our establishment's parts.
If, for example, you are Laurence Tribe in 1984, Harvard professor of law, leftist pillar of the establishment, you can "write" your magnum opus by using the products of your student assistant, Ron Klain. A decade later, after Klain admits to having written some parts of the book, and the other parts are found to be verbatim or paraphrases of a book published in 1974, you can claim (perhaps correctly) that your plagiarism was "inadvertent," and you can count on the Law School's dean, Elena Kagan, to appoint a committee including former and future Harvard president Derek Bok that issues a secret report that "closes" the incident. Incidentally, Kagan ends up a justice of the Supreme Court. Not one of these people did their jobs: the professor did not write the book himself, the assistant plagiarized instead of researching, the dean and the committee did not hold the professor accountable, and all ended up rewarded. By contrast, for example, learned papers and distinguished careers in climatology at MIT (Richard Lindzen) or UVA (S. Fred Singer) are not enough for their questions about "global warming" to be taken seriously. For our ruling class, identity always trumps.
|
|
Read more... [America's Ruling Class and the Perils of Revolution]
|
|
Written by Edward R. Long and Jennifer M. Cohen
|
|
Wednesday, 21 July 2010 17:31 |
|
A survey of the West Virginia temperature record reveals that temperature anomalies were stable or fell from 1905 to 2009. Raw data from a set of meteorological stations show cooling at the rate of ?0.6±0.2 ºC/century, while United States Historical Climatology Network (USHCN) Version 2 adjusted records for the same station set yield no change, 0.0±0.2 ºC/century. For the 1998-2009 interval the average temperature anomalies of the station set declined at rates of ?6.8±3.6 ºC/century and ?4.8±3.6 ºC/century, respectively for the raw and USHCN Version 2 adjusted data
|
|
Read more... [West Virginia - The State Global Warming Forgot]
|
|
Written by Joseph D’Aleo
|
|
Wednesday, 21 July 2010 01:09 |
|
Recently we shared a story in the Wall Street Pit how NASA has gradually reduced the warm middle 20th century blip and created a more continuous warming. You can see in this 1976 National Geographic graph, a rather significant warm period starting in the 1920s and peaking during the dust bowl era in the United States in the 1930s and only slowly declining heading into the 1950s. It showed more significant cooling in the 1960s and 1970s. The story questioned where to from there.
|
|
Read more... [Progressive Enhancement of Global Temperature Trends]
|
|
Written by Dennis Ambler
|
|
Tuesday, 20 July 2010 15:02 |
|
Recent remarks by President Obama and Treasury Secretary Geithner, promote the idea that the US can no longer be the primary driver of world economic growth and that other world economies must grow in preference to the US, to achieve “global economic growth”.
|
|
Read more... [Changing the Engine of the Global Economy: The Next UN Strategy]
|
|
|