SPPI Reports 35 scientific errors in Gore’s climate movie Print E-mail
Written by Robert Ferguson   
Saturday, 20 October 2007

WASHINGTON, DC, October 21, 2007

SPPI today reveals 35 errors in Al Gore’s discredited climate movie An Inconvenient Truth

(http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/monckton/goreerrors.html ).

The Viscount Monckton of Brenchley, an expert witness in the UK legal case condemning the movie, compiled the science-based list in response to recent inaccurate public comments by Gore’s environment advisor relative to the High Court’s findings.

Read more...
 
35 Inconvenient Truths: The errors in Al Gore’s movie Print E-mail
Written by Christopher Monckton of Brenchley   
Friday, 19 October 2007
A spokesman for Al Gore has issued a questionable response to the news that in October 2007 the High Court in London had identified nine “errors” in his movie An Inconvenient Truth. The judge had stated that, if the UK Government had not agreed to send to every secondary school in England a corrected guidance note making clear the mainstream scientific position on these nine “errors”, he would have made a finding that the Government’s distribution of the film and the first draft of the guidance note earlier in 2007 to all English secondary schools had been an unlawful contravention of an Act of Parliament prohibiting the political indoctrination of children.
Read more...
 
Accurate Climate Change Assessment, An Impossible Task? Print E-mail
Written by Joe D’Aleo, CCM   
Sunday, 14 October 2007
Recently, a critical adjustment[1] was made by NASA to its US Annual mean temperature record since 1895, due to discovering an error in their adjustments found by Steve McIntyre, who also blew the whistle on the flawed hockey stick of Mann, Bradley and Hughes.
Read more...
 
UPDATED: Hurricane Threat to Florida: Climate Change or Demographics? Print E-mail
Written by Robert Ferguson   
Saturday, 13 October 2007
Despite the lack of any trends in hurricane landfalls along the U.S. and Florida coasts, or damage to U.S. coastlines when population demographics are taken into account, the impact from a single storm can be enormous. The massive population and infrastructure build-up of the US coastline has vastly raised the potential damage that a storm can inflict. It is stunningly dishonest and irresponsibly dangerous to insinuate, let alone assert, that CO2 mitigation policies could cage the destructiveness of nature, particularly in hurricane-prone Florida.
Read more...
 
Doing Harm - The Mercury Scare Print E-mail
Written by Robert Ferguson   
Wednesday, 26 September 2007
Read more...
 
SPPI exposes fundamental scientific error in Laurie David’s “global warming” book for children Print E-mail
Written by SPPI Staff   
Thursday, 13 September 2007
(Washington, D.C.) A fundamental scientific error lurks in a book calculated to terrify schoolchildren about “global warming”, Robert Ferguson, SPPI president, announced today: “The Down To Earth Guide to Global Warming", by Laurie David and Cambria Gordon, is intentionally designed to propagandize unsuspecting school children who do not have enough knowledge to know what is being done to them."
Read more...
 
A Fundamental Scientific Error in “global warming” Book for Children Print E-mail
Written by SPPI Staff   
Wednesday, 12 September 2007
David tells children:

Deep down in the Antarctic ice are atmosphere samples from the past, trapped in tiny air bubbles...
Read more...
 
IPCC Peer Review Process an Illusion, finds SPPI Analysis Print E-mail
Written by SPPI Staff   
Monday, 10 September 2007

Published by the Science and Public Policy Institute, climate data analyst John McLean has written an analysis of the reviewer comments to the UN’s most recent IPCC Assessment Report released in April.

Read more...
 
Fallacies about Global Warming Print E-mail
Written by John McLean   
Friday, 07 September 2007
It is widely alleged that the science of global warming is “settled”. This implies that all the major scientific aspects of climate change are well understood and uncontroversial, and that scientists are now just mopping up unimportant details. The allegation is profoundly untrue: for example the US alone is said to be spending more than $4 billion annually on climate research, which is a lot to pay for detailing; and great uncertainty and argument surround many of the principles of climate change, and especially the magnitude of any human causation for warming.
Read more...
 
Peer review? What peer review? Print E-mail
Written by John McLean   
Thursday, 06 September 2007
The IPCC would have us believe that its reports are diligently reviewed by many hundreds of scientists and that these reviewers endorse the contents of the report. An analysis of the reviewers' comments for the scientific assessment report by Working Group I show a very different and very worrying story.
Read more...
 
Researcher demands apology for professional discourtesy from essayist who claimed climate consensus Print E-mail
Written by Robert Ferguson   
Thursday, 06 September 2007
Naomi Oreskes, a historian at the University of California, San Diego, faces questions after an academic researcher formally complained to Chancellor Marye Anne Fox that Oreskes had not read a draft paper by him before thrice publicly accusing him of “misrepresentation”.
Read more...
 
Open Letter in Response to Namoi Oreskes’ Criticisms Print E-mail
Written by Mr. Klaus-Martin Schulte   
Wednesday, 05 September 2007
My attention has been drawn to what purports to be a statement by Naomi Oreskes, a science historian at the University of California at San Diego, commenting on a forthcoming but not yet finalized paper of mine, an early draft of which was circulated without my authority.
Read more...
 
SPPI Papers by British Peer Disprove Catastrophic Human-Induced Global Warming and "Consensus" Print E-mail
Written by SPPI Staff   
Thursday, 23 August 2007
In two major new Science and Public Policy (SPPI) papers, Lord Monckton, a former advisor to Margaret Thatcher as UK Prime Minister, startlingly but definitively demonstrates that the distinctive fingerprint of human greenhouse warming predicted by the UN’s computer models is absent from real-world observations, and that the reputed scientific “consensus” on “global warming” is likewise non-existent.
Read more...
 
U.S. Temperature Rankings Rearranged, Problems and Concerns with Temperature data sets Print E-mail
Written by Robert Ferguson   
Thursday, 23 August 2007
Trumpets were blaring at the Washington Post when, on the front page of the January 10th, 2007 edition of the paper, they proclaimed “Climate Experts Worry as 2006 is Hottest year on record in U.S.” The Post was relying on temperature data supplied to them from the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC).
Read more...
 
Greenhouse Warming? What Greenhouse Warming? Print E-mail
Written by Christopher Monckton, 3rd Viscount Monkton of Brenchley   
Wednesday, 22 August 2007
THE FACT of warming tells us nothing of the cause. Yet the scientific consensus is that, though the rapid climatic warming from 1906 to 1940 was a natural recovery from the historically low temperatures of the Little Ice Age, it is we who are chiefly to blame for the equally rapid warming from 1975 to the present.
Read more...
 
Wildfires in a warming West, The relationships between drought, wildfires and global temperatures Print E-mail
Written by Robert Ferguson   
Wednesday, 22 August 2007
Whenever it is hot and dry in the western United States, the frequency and intensity of wildfires there pick up. A good number of paleo records of climate and fire occurrence show that such has been true for many hundreds of years into the past. And just as it has been in the past, it likely will be in the future, with or without alleged human alterations in the climate.
Read more...
 
A Critique on the Lockwood/Frochlich Paper in the Royal Society Proceedings Print E-mail
Written by Ken Gregory   
Thursday, 16 August 2007
Mike Lockwood and Claus Frohlich published a paper in the Proceedings of the Royal Society which concludes that the Sun could not be responsible for the global temperature rise over the last twenty years. The BBC published a news story on the paper dated July 10, 2007.
Read more...
 
Positive Feedback: Have We Been Fooling Ourselves? Print E-mail
Written by Roy Spencer   
Wednesday, 15 August 2007
There are three main points/opinions/issues I’d like to explore, which are all interrelated...
Read more...
 
Bad News for Science in Newsweek Print E-mail
Written by Robert Ferguson   
Thursday, 09 August 2007

The Third International Mathematics and Science Study Results reveals that US public school children are remarkably sub par in math and science capabilities.

Apparently things are not much brighter for the adults at Newsweek Magazine.

Read more...
 
Poor Form—Comments on the Minneapolis Bridge Collapse Print E-mail
Written by Robert Ferguson   
Thursday, 09 August 2007

Apparently, some people know no boundaries for indecency. Take Joseph Romm for instance. Romm, a former member of the Clinton administration, claimed Monday that global warming might have played a factor in the collapse of the I-35W Bridge in Minneapolis last week.

Read more...
 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next > End >>

Results 141 - 168 of 173