|
Written by George Allen and Marlo Lewis
|
|
Monday, 24 May 2010 16:14 |
|
To restore the constitutional separation of powers and democratic accountability, Congress must overturn EPA‘s endangerment finding. S. J. Res. 26, a resolution of disapproval, introduced by Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), under the Congressional Review Act (CRA), provides an appropriate vehicle to accomplish that.
|
|
Read more... [Overturning EPA's Endangerment A Constitutional Imperative]
|
|
Written by William Happer
|
|
Friday, 21 May 2010 23:18 |
|
Statement of William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University Before the Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming U.S. House of Representatives
|
|
Read more... [Climate Science in the Political Arena]
|
|
Written by Barry Brill
|
|
Wednesday, 19 May 2010 10:51 |
|
The official archivist of New Zealand’s climate records, the National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA), offers top billing to its 147-year-old national mean temperature series (the “NIWA Seven-station Series” or NSS). This series shows that New Zealand experienced a twentieth-century warming trend of 0.92°C.
The official temperature record is wrong. The instrumental raw data correctly show that New Zealand average temperatures have remained remarkably steady at 12.6°C +/- 0.5°C for a century and a half. NIWA’s doctoring of that data is indefensible.
|
|
Read more... [Crisis in New Zealand Climatology]
|
|
Wednesday, 12 May 2010 19:36 |
|
This statement provides my analysis of the effects of ocean acidification on our living resources and our economy. It lightly touches on the other topics of the Hearing: the oil spill and the EPA role in ocean health.
|
|
Read more... [EPA's Role in Protecting Ocean Health Should Focus on the "Here-and-Now" Threats]
|
|
Written by Editor, Christopher Monckton
|
|
Wednesday, 12 May 2010 12:30 |
|
The authoritative Monthly CO2 Report for April 2010 discusses the panic among the climate-extremist faction as none of their predictions of doom comes to pass – plus lots more.
|
|
Read more... [SPPI Monthly CO2 Report: April 2010]
|
|
Wednesday, 12 May 2010 12:21 |
|
TESTIMONY OF THE VISCOUNT MONCKTON OF BRENCHLEY BEFORE CONGRESS, MAY 6, 2010
|
|
Read more... [Testimony of the Viscount Monckton of Brenchley Before Congress, 6 May 2010]
|
|
Written by Dennish Ambler
|
|
Monday, 03 May 2010 13:28 |
|
Jane Lubchenco, NOAA Administrator, is keen to expand her role, get more funding and enlarge her organization. She sees “Acid Seas” as a suitable vehicle and has given interviews claiming that the oceans are becoming more acidic and “threatening much of the life in the oceans.”
|
|
Read more... [Dying Shell Fish Larvae: A Distorted View]
|
|
Written by Dennis Ambler
|
|
Monday, 03 May 2010 11:40 |
|
Much has been written over recent months about the enigmatic Chairman of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, (IPCC), Dr Rajendra K Pachauri. He has been labeled a crook and a fraudster by some, because of his extensive interests in companies that stand to benefit from carbon trading, but those searching for direct and actionable evidence of wrong-doing will be disappointed.
What they will find is someone who has used his position as IPCC Chairman to attract major funding to his own organization, The Energy and Resources Institute2 (TERI), known previously (and concurrently by some), as the Tata Energy Research Institute.
|
|
Read more... [Dr Rajendra Pachauri and the IPCC - No Fossil Fool]
|
|
Written by Dr. Mike Norton-Griffiths
|
|
Wednesday, 28 April 2010 21:47 |
|
In September last year, the World Meteorological Organisation hosted some 1,500 climate scientists at the much unheralded and poorly reported World Climate Conference 3 in Geneva, Switzerland. WCC3, an important precursor to “Copenhagen”, was called primarily to discuss, and advise on, the relative importance of shorter term climate cycles versus longer term trends. It succeeded in showing both the true depth of the divergence of views among the world’s top climate scientists, and how uncertain are predictions about global warming.
|
|
Read more... [Cool It! And Let's Think for Ourselves]
|
|
Written by Christopher Monckton
|
|
Wednesday, 28 April 2010 21:36 |
|
In April 2010, a sea-fisherman gave testimony about ocean “acidification” before the US Senate. The list of supposed effects of ocean “acidification” included in the fisherman’s testimony seems to have been written for him by climate-extremist lobbyists.
|
|
Read more... [Answers to a Fisherman's Testimony about Ocean Acidification]
|
|
Written by Marlo Lewis
|
|
Thursday, 22 April 2010 12:17 |
|
The Pentagon is perhaps the most influential lobby on Capitol Hill and has the respect of many on the center-right who hold the likes of Greenpeace, Al Gore, and the United Nations in low regard. What’s more, if “even the generals are worried” and climate change is officially deemed a national security threat, then proponents of cap-and-trade get to wave the flag and depict their opponents as venal, partisan, or unpatriotic. So it’s not surprising that global warming activists for years have sought to institutionalize climate change concerns in Department of Defense (DOD) intelligence assessments, program planning, and budgeting.
|
|
Read more... [The Department of Defense Should Assess the Security Risks of Climate Change Policies]
|
|
Written by James Hall
|
|
Thursday, 22 April 2010 12:05 |
|
Financial scandals are not new. Schemes to leverage risk and cheat the public are mainstays of the mad “Cap and Trade” stratagem, in the ongoing war, against genuine free enterprise. The latest ploy is the industrial wind swindle.
|
|
Read more... [Industrial Wind and the Wall Street Cap and Trade Fund]
|
|
Written by Joseph L. Bast
|
|
Thursday, 22 April 2010 11:54 |
|
The theory of climate change that most people are familiar with is com monly called anthropogenic (man-made) global warming, or AGW for short. That theory holds that man-made greenhouse gases, primarily car bon dioxide (CO2), are the predominant cause of the global warming that occurred during the past 50 years.
|
|
Read more... [Seven Theories of Climate Change]
|
|
Written by Walter Cunningham
|
|
Wednesday, 21 April 2010 17:20 |
|
There is a war going on between those who believe that human activities are responsible for global warming and those who don’t. Contrary to the way the debate is often framed by the media, those who believe in anthropogenic global warming (AGW) do not hold the high ground, scientifically. Their critics do.
|
|
Read more... [Global Warming, Facts vs. Faith, One Astronaut's Views]
|
|
Written by Dr. Robert E. Stevenson
|
|
Wednesday, 21 April 2010 13:56 |
|
Contrary to recent press reports that the oceans hold the still-undetected global atmospheric warming predicted by climate models, ocean warming occurs in 100-year cycles, independent of both radiative and human influences.
|
|
Read more... [Yes, the Ocean Has Warmed; No, It's Not 'Global Warming']
|
|
Written by Dr. Willie Soon
|
|
Friday, 16 April 2010 09:35 |
|
PowerPoint slides from Dr. Willie Soon’s Congressional staff briefing held in DC on April 13, 2010.
The paper upon which the briefing was based can be found here: http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/reprint/carbon_myopia.html
Abstract:
In 2007 the Supreme Court commented that “greenhouse gases fit well within the Clean Air Act’s capacious definition of air pollutant.” In this presentation, Dr. Soon will discuss why atmospheric CO2 is not an “air pollutant”. Three points of discussion will be: (1) CO2 is not an air pollutant, (2) Ocean acidification claims are exaggerated, (3) The magical CO2 control knob idea “to save the world” is essentially dead.
|
|
Read more... [PowerPoint slides from Dr. Willie Soon’s Congressional staff briefing held in DC on April 13, 2010]
|
|
Written by Christopher Monckton
|
|
Thursday, 15 April 2010 08:48 |
|
The authoritative Monthly CO2 Report for February 2010 reports on the attempts of the US Administration to legislate – via Congress, via the EPA, and via the UN – to stifle and destroy forever the freedom for which the Founding Fathers so valiantly strove. Editorial Comment: Page 3.
FEATURED: The Himalayan glaciers are doing just fine. Professor Cliff Ollier sends us a special report. Pages 4-9.
IPCC assumes CO2 concentration will reach 836 ppmv by 2100, but, for nine years, CO2 concentration has headed straight for only 570 ppmv by 2100. This factor alone almost halves all of the IPCC’s temperature projections. Pages 10-12.
Since 1980 global temperature has risen at only 2.5 °F (1.4 °C)/century, not 7 F° (3.9 C°) as IPCC predicts. Pages 13-15.
Sea level rose just 8 inches in the 20th century, and has been rising since 1993 at a very modest 1 ft/century. Page 16.
Arctic sea-ice extent is at a 10-year record for the time of year. In the Antarctic, sea ice extent reached a record high in 2007. Global sea ice extent shows little trend for 30 years. Pages 17-21.
Hurricane and tropical-cyclone activity is almost at its lowest since satellite measurement began. Pages 22-24.
Sunspot activity is back to normal: but, looking back it was a long – and cool – solar minimum. Pages 25-26.
The (very few) benefits and the (very large) costs of the Waxman/Markey Bill are illustrated at Pages 27-30.
Aswan damnation: This month’s Science Focus looks at how the Aswan High Dam is causing Sahelian drought. Page 31.
As always, there’s our “global warming” ready reckoner, and our monthly selection of scientific papers. Pages 32-37.
The medieval warm period was real, global, and warmer than the present, as our global map shows. Page 38.
And finally ... our very own Climate Codswallopometer: a Very Important Graph. Page 39.
|
|
Read more... [SPPI Monthly CO2 Report: February 2010]
|
|
Written by Richard S Courtney
|
|
Wednesday, 07 April 2010 10:57 |
|
The Climategate affair originated in November 2009 when files were hacked or leaked from the Climate Research Unit (CRU) of the University of East Anglia (UEA) and were published on the internet at various places. These files – especially the emails they contained – provide prima facie evidence of scientific malpractice by climate scientists who call themselves the ‘Team’. Several investigations of the affair have been initiated and two of these are concluded. The concluded investigations were by Penn State University (PSU) and the UK Parliament’s House of Commons Select Committee on Science and Technology. Both these investigations have mostly exonerated the Team. But the findings of these investigations have been widely excoriated as being a ‘whitewash’.
|
|
Read more... [Comments on the 8th Report of Session '09-'10 of UK's House of Commons Select Cmt. on Sci. & Tech.]
|
|
Written by Ross McKitrick
|
|
Wednesday, 07 April 2010 05:36 |
|
This is the story of how I spent 2 years trying to publish a paper that refutes an important claim in the
2007 report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The claim in question is not just
wrong, but based on fabricated evidence. Showing that the claim is fabricated is easy: it suffices merely
to quote the section of the report, since no supporting evidence is given. But unsupported guesses may
turn out to be true. Showing the IPCC claim is also false took some mundane statistical work, but the
results were clear. Once the numbers were crunched and the paper was written up, I began sending it to
science journals. That is when the runaround began.
|
|
Read more... [Circling the Bandwagons: My Adventures Correcting the IPCC]
|
|
Written by Jennifer M. Cohen, PhD.
|
|
Tuesday, 06 April 2010 12:35 |
|
This report compares the raw with the United States Historical Climatology Network Version 2 (USHCN V2) adjusted temperature records for the twenty-four USHCN listed temperature stations in the state of Pennsylvania. Averaging over the twenty-four stations the raw data yielded a small linear decline with temperatures trending -0.1 ± 0.1 ºC/century, while the U.S. Historical Climatology Network (USCHN) Version 2 adjusted data revealed an increase of 0.7 ± 0.1 ºC/century. Over the twelve year period 1998-2009 a drop in temperature was observed in both data sets with a raw trend of -0.75 ± 0.1 ºC/decade and an adjusted trend of -0.65 ± 0.1 ºC/decade.
|
|
Read more... [A Review of the U.S. Historical Climatology Network Version 2: Adjusted Temperature Record for Penn.]
|
|
|