Most Recent
- Another Day, Another Dollar - CFC's and the UN
- Is Temperature Spinning Out of Control?
- Observed Climate Change and the Negligible Global Effect of Greenhouse-gas Emission Limits in the State of Massachusetts
- Surface Temperature Records: Policy Driven Deception? UPDATED, AUGUST 27, 2010
- Are Reconstructions of Surface Temperatures Over the Last 1000 Years Reliable?
| Response to U.S. Secretary of Energy on Climate Statement |
 |
 |
| Written by the Viscount Monckton of Brenchley |
| Wednesday, 28 October 2009 03:52 |
|
For the Full Report in PDF Form, please click here.
[Illustrations, footnotes and references available in PDF version] SECRETARY CHU’S senate testimony is predicated upon two false assumptions: that the “threat” from “climate change” is “grave”; and that, even if it were grave, reducing carbon emissions would make a difference. He cites the now-outdated 2007 Climate Assessment Report of the IPCC and a subsequent but also now-outdated MIT study, saying global warming by 2100 would be 7-11 Fº. These excessive estimates are founded solely on computerized guesswork. |
