|
Written by Staff
|
|
Tuesday, 08 February 2011 12:36 |
|
The climate impact of the RGGI carbon dioxide emissions reduction plan is infinitesimal and inconsequential.
New Hampshire’s role in mitigating future climate change under RGGI is even less.
|
|
Read more... [Impacts of the NE Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI)]
|
|
Written by Staff
|
|
Friday, 04 February 2011 14:17 |
|
In this report, we review New Mexico’s long-term climate history and find little in the way of evidence that greenhouse gas build-up in the atmosphere has altered New Mexico’s climate. Instead of long-term changes, short-term variability dominates the state’s average temperature, precipitation, and drought frequency. Current temperatures are not all that different than the ones observed at the beginning of the last century—100 years ago.
|
|
Read more... [Observed Climate Change and the Negligible Global Effect of Greenhouse-gas Emission Limits in the State of New Mexico - 2011 Report]
|
|
Written by Craig D. Idso and Sherwood B. Idso
|
|
Wednesday, 02 February 2011 15:53 |
|
As presently constituted, earth’s atmosphere contains just slightly less than 400 ppm of the colorless and odorless gas we call carbon dioxide or CO2. That’s only four-hundredths of one percent. Consequently, even if the air's CO2 concentration was tripled, carbon dioxide would still comprise only a little over one tenth of one percent of the air we breathe, which is far less than what wafted through earth’s atmosphere eons ago, when the planet was a virtual garden place. Nevertheless, a small increase in this minuscule amount of CO2 is frequently predicted to produce a suite of dire environmental consequences, including dangerous global warming, catastrophic sea level rise, reduced agricultural output, and the destruction of many natural ecosystems, as well as dramatic increases in extreme weather phenomena, such as droughts, floods and hurricanes.
As strange as it may seem, these frightening future scenarios are derived from a single source of information: the ever-evolving computer-driven climate models that presume to reduce the important physical, chemical and biological processes that combine to determine the state of earth’s climate into a set of mathematical equations out of which their forecasts are produced. But do we really know what all of those complex and interacting processes are? And even if we did -- which we don't -- could we correctly reduce them into manageable computer code so as to produce reliable forecasts 50 or 100 years into the future?
|
|
Read more... [Carbon Dioxide and the Earth's Future, Pursuing the Prudent Path]
|
|
Written by Dr. Don J. Easterbrook
|
|
Wednesday, 26 January 2011 14:02 |
|
Temperature changes recorded in the GISP2 ice core from the Greenland Ice Sheet show that the global warming experienced during the past century pales into insignificance when compared to the magnitude of profound climate reversals over the past 25,000 years.
|
|
Read more... [Magnitude and Rate of Climate Changes]
|
|
Written by Christopher Monckto
|
|
Tuesday, 18 January 2011 12:46 |
|
Scientists agree that the Brisbane floods are a consequence of the unusually severe la Niña phase of the el Niño Southern Oscillation, a naturally-occurring four-year cycle of warming and cooling of the world’s oceans, starting in the equatorial eastern Pacific and carried around the globe by the thermohaline circulation of ocean currents.
Scientists also agree – for it is a matter of record – that floods of similar severity have struck the east coast of Australia before: twice in the 19th century and most recently in 1974. These earlier floods could not have been caused by manmade “global warming”, because there was not enough of it to make any difference at that time.
|
|
Read more... ['Global Warming' Did Not Cause Brisbane Floods]
|
|
|
Written by Joseph D'Aleo
|
|
Saturday, 15 January 2011 15:57 |
|
The pressure has been mounting. The public doubt about global warming has been increasing in recent years given Climategate, and how promises of warm snowless winters failed. After cold and snowy winters in 2007/08 and 2008/09, the winter of 2009/10 was the coldest ever in parts of the southeast, and in parts of Siberia and the coldest since 1977/78 or 1962/63 in many parts of the United States, Europe and Asia. This past December was the second coldest in the entire Central England Temperature record extending back to 1659. It was the coldest ever December in diverse locations like Ireland, Sweden, and Florida. Reluctantly, alarmists changed their tune and the promise of warm and snowless winters as recent as 4 years ago morphed into global warming means cold and snowy winters.
|
|
Read more... [Why The NOAA and NASA Proclamations Should Be Ignored: UPDATED]
|
|
Written by Christopher Monckton of Brenchley
|
|
Tuesday, 11 January 2011 15:35 |
|
Four cold winters in a row ought to have raised questions in legislators’ minds about the competence of the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the IPCC, which they have generously but unwisely funded and trusted. The IPCC’s dire predictions of dangerous warming are not happening in observed reality.
|
|
Read more... [Alarming Warming?]
|
|
Written by Christopher Monckton of Brenchley
|
|
Saturday, 08 January 2011 21:46 |
|
Michael Steketee, writing in The Australian in January 2011, echoed the BBC (whose journalists’ pension fund is heavily weighted towards “green” “investments”) and other climate-extremist vested interests in claiming that 2010 was the warmest year on record worldwide. Mr. Steketee’s short article makes two dozen questionable assertions, which either require heavy qualification or are downright false. His assertions will be printed in bold face: the truth will appear in Roman face.
|
|
Read more... [2010 was the Warmest Year on Record]
|
|
Written by Dennis Ambler
|
|
Tuesday, 21 December 2010 12:39 |
|
We are entreated daily that the West must cut its industrial base because the planet is in danger from our CO2 emissions and our politicians happily fall into line to impose draconian energy taxes. There is somewhat of a disconnect when we read that industrialisation is proceeding apace in developing nations, with money from the industrialised nations. The announcement from Fiat, Italy, is another example of global corporations moving their operations to the developing world where they can emit to their heart's content without penalty and get paid by us for doing so, with money we give to the UN for "development".
|
|
Read more... [Contraction and Convergence]
|
|