|
Written by Christopher Monckton of Brenchley
|
|
Sunday, 28 October 2007 |
|
Kevin Trenberth (Rocky Mountain News, October 24), commenting on Mike Rosen’s article expressing legitimate doubts about the award of the Nobel Peace Prize to Al Gore, makes 23 scientific mistakes, each of which falls in the direction of magnifying the unjustifiable alarm stoked by panicky politicians and extravagantly-funded environmentalists in cahoots with a shrinking clique of scientists in denial of observational climate data.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Christopher Monckton of Brenchley
|
|
Friday, 19 October 2007 |
|
A spokesman for Al Gore has issued a questionable response to the news that in October 2007 the High Court in London had identified nine “errors” in his movie An Inconvenient Truth. The judge had stated that, if the UK Government had not agreed to send to every secondary school in England a corrected guidance note making clear the mainstream scientific position on these nine “errors”, he would have made a finding that the Government’s distribution of the film and the first draft of the guidance note earlier in 2007 to all English secondary schools had been an unlawful contravention of an Act of Parliament prohibiting the political indoctrination of children.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Christopher Monckton, 3rd Viscount Monkton of Brenchley
|
|
Wednesday, 22 August 2007 |
|
THE FACT of warming tells us nothing of the cause. Yet the scientific consensus is that, though the rapid climatic warming from 1906 to 1940 was a natural recovery from the historically low temperatures of the Little Ice Age, it is we who are chiefly to blame for the equally rapid warming from 1975 to the present. |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Viscount Monckton of Brenchley
|
|
Thursday, 19 July 2007 |
|
Politicians, scientists and bureaucrats
have contrived a threat of Biblical floods, droughts, plagues and extinctions
worthier of St. John
the Divine than of science.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Viscount Monckton of Brenchley
|
|
Thursday, 19 July 2007 |
|
Introduction: A cursory examination of the list
of Gore’s errors is enough to demonstrate that each of them serves to magnify
the supposed planetary threat posed by “global warming”, or to pour scorn and
contempt on any who dare to gainsay the supposed “consensus”. Therefore we must
conclude that Gore’s movie was not science: it was sophisticated propaganda
that relied upon the ignorance of his cinema-going audiences and the fawning
acquiescence of news media whose editorial and political predisposition was in
any event in favor of presenting his Apocalyptic version of climate change
regardless of the fact that at so many points central to his argument his
presentation was fundamentally false.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 Next > End >>
|
| Results 6 - 10 of 16 |
