|
Thursday, 30 April 2009 |
|
“Dangerous Climate Change is Coming”
by Christopher Monckton | April 30, 2009
The Scare:
Two papers published in Nature in spring 2009 say that the rise in
global temperature is unlikely to remain below the politically-defined
threshold of “dangerous climate change”, if global economic growth
continues at its current pace. The papers are based on computer
simulations of the climate response to greenhouse-gas emissions.
Policymakers have adopted a goal of keeping the global rise in mean
surface temperatures to no more than 2 C° (3.6 F°) above pre-industrial
levels.
Myles Allen et al. simulate the mean “global warming” that would result
from a given cumulative carbon emission. They conclude that a trillion
tonnes of carbon emissions (about 3.7 trillion tonnes of CO2, roughly
half of which has already been emitted) produces a “most likely”
warming of 2 C° (3.6 F°).
Malte Meinshausen et al. take a slightly different tack by modelling
the probability of global temperature rises across a range of
greenhouse-gas emissions scenarios. They find that total emissions from
2000 to 2050 of about 1,400 gigatonnes of CO2 yields a 50% probability
of exceeding 2 C° warming by the end of the 21st century. Emissions for
the last seven years were almost 250 gigatonnes, implying that even
without future increases in CO2 emissions the total emissions from
2000-2050 may well exceed this 50% probability.
The Truth:
Nature is one of many “scientific” journals that have openly declared
an editorial prejudice in favor of a frankly alarmist viewpoint on the
climate.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Thursday, 30 April 2009 |
|
“Dangerous Climate Change is Coming”
by Christopher Monckton | April 30, 2009
The Scare:
Two papers published in Nature in spring 2009 say that the rise in
global temperature is unlikely to remain below the politically-defined
threshold of “dangerous climate change”, if global economic growth
continues at its current pace. The papers are based on computer
simulations of the climate response to greenhouse-gas emissions.
Policymakers have adopted a goal of keeping the global rise in mean
surface temperatures to no more than 2 C° (3.6 F°) above pre-industrial
levels.
Myles Allen et al. simulate the mean “global warming” that would result
from a given cumulative carbon emission. They conclude that a trillion
tonnes of carbon emissions (about 3.7 trillion tonnes of CO2, roughly
half of which has already been emitted) produces a “most likely”
warming of 2 C° (3.6 F°).
Malte Meinshausen et al. take a slightly different tack by modelling
the probability of global temperature rises across a range of
greenhouse-gas emissions scenarios. They find that total emissions from
2000 to 2050 of about 1,400 gigatonnes of CO2 yields a 50% probability
of exceeding 2 C° warming by the end of the 21st century. Emissions for
the last seven years were almost 250 gigatonnes, implying that even
without future increases in CO2 emissions the total emissions from
2000-2050 may well exceed this 50% probability.
The Truth:
Nature is one of many “scientific” journals that have openly declared
an editorial prejudice in favor of a frankly alarmist viewpoint on the
climate.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Christopher Monckton
|
|
Thursday, 30 April 2009 |
|
Clark Hoyt, Esq., Public Editor and Readers’ Representative, The New York Times.
Dear Mr. Hoyt,
Deliberate misrepresentation in a front-page article by Andrew Revkin on Friday, 24 April, 2009
The New York Times guidelines for staff writers on “Journalistic
Ethics” begin by stating the principles that all journalists should
respect: impartiality and neutrality; integrity; and avoidance of
conflicts of interest. Andrew Revkin’s front-page article on Friday, 24
April, 2009, falsely alleging that a coalition of energy corporations
had for many years acted like tobacco corporations, misrepresenting
advice from its own scientists about the supposed threat of “global
warming,” offends grievously against all of these principles.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Christopher Monckton
|
|
Thursday, 30 April 2009 |
|
Gore: The Arctic is warming at an unprecedented rate. New
research, which draws upon recently declassified data collected by U.S.
nuclear submarines traveling under the Arctic ice cap for the last 50
years, has given us, for the first time, a three-dimensional view of
the ice cap, and researchers at the Naval Postgraduate School have told
us that the entire Arctic ice cap may totally disappear in summer in as
little as five years if nothing is done to curb emissions of greenhouse
gas pollution.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Christopher Monckton
|
|
Thursday, 30 April 2009 |
|
Gore: The Arctic is warming at an unprecedented rate. New
research, which draws upon recently declassified data collected by U.S.
nuclear submarines traveling under the Arctic ice cap for the last 50
years, has given us, for the first time, a three-dimensional view of
the ice cap, and researchers at the Naval Postgraduate School have told
us that the entire Arctic ice cap may totally disappear in summer in as
little as five years if nothing is done to curb emissions of greenhouse
gas pollution.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>
|
| Results 36 - 40 of 114 |