Monckton Collection
Climate Conspiracy E-mail
Written by Christopher Monckton   
Friday, 05 June 2009 04:59
The day before yesterday they called it “global warming”. Yesterday they called it “climate change”. Today they call it “energy security”. Tomorrow they will call it what it is – absolute rubbish.


Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Free and Open Source Software News Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! Twitter! Joomla Free PHP
Last Updated on Friday, 05 June 2009 05:01
Read more... [Climate Conspiracy]
 
"'Unequivocal' 'Consensus' on 'Global Warming'" E-mail
Written by Christopher Monckton   
Monday, 25 May 2009 08:35
Science is not, repeat not, done by “consensus”, though politics is. The IPCC process, which aims at and then falsely claims “consensus”, is an explicitly political process, and not a scientific one.


Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Free and Open Source Software News Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! Twitter! Joomla Free PHP
Last Updated on Monday, 25 May 2009 08:40
Read more... ['Unequivocal' 'Consensus' on 'Global Warming']
 
"'Unequivocal' 'Consensus' on 'Global Warming'" E-mail
Written by Christopher Monckton   
Monday, 25 May 2009 08:35
Science is not, repeat not, done by “consensus”, though politics is. The IPCC process, which aims at and then falsely claims “consensus”, is an explicitly political process, and not a scientific one.


Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Free and Open Source Software News Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! Twitter! Joomla Free PHP
Last Updated on Monday, 25 May 2009 08:40
Read more... ['Unequivocal' 'Consensus' on 'Global Warming']
 
Why Waxman/Markey Won't Work: A cost-effectiveness metric for CO2 mitigation policies E-mail
Written by Christopher Monckton   
Monday, 18 May 2009 14:49
A simple, robust metric to analyze the cost-effectiveness of measures to mitigate anthropogenic CO2 emissions, expressed not – as now – in tonnes of CO2 emission foregone but in Kelvin degrees of warming prevented, is described, evaluated, and applied to various currently-proposed mitigation policies, all of which prove disproportionately costly and ineffective


Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Free and Open Source Software News Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! Twitter! Joomla Free PHP
Last Updated on Monday, 18 May 2009 14:53
Read more... [Why Waxman/Markey Won't Work: A cost-effectiveness metric for CO2 mitigation policies]
 
Why Waxman/Markey Won't Work: A cost-effectiveness metric for CO2 mitigation policies E-mail
Written by Christopher Monckton   
Monday, 18 May 2009 14:49
A simple, robust metric to analyze the cost-effectiveness of measures to mitigate anthropogenic CO2 emissions, expressed not – as now – in tonnes of CO2 emission foregone but in Kelvin degrees of warming prevented, is described, evaluated, and applied to various currently-proposed mitigation policies, all of which prove disproportionately costly and ineffective


Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Free and Open Source Software News Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! Twitter! Joomla Free PHP
Last Updated on Monday, 18 May 2009 14:53
Read more... [Why Waxman/Markey Won't Work: A cost-effectiveness metric for CO2 mitigation policies]
 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>

Page 8 of 25