|
Sunday, 07 June 2009 15:45 |
|
Steven Chu, entertainingly described as an “Energy Secretary”, says we can Save the
Planet from “global warming” by painting our rooftops and roads white.
He says making roofs and roads paler would have the same effect as
taking every automobile in the world off the road for 11 years.
Rush Limbaugh, entertainingly as always, but pointedly, asks –
“Now, would somebody explain to me how he knows this? …
If we can do something that will effectively remove the carbon
emissions of every car on the road for 11 years, then why are we doing
anything else? Why are we doing cap and trade? Why are we getting rid
of SUVs? … How much paint is this going to take, by the way? How much of a footprint does paint manufacturing leave? … I
need a scientist to answer this for me. I understand how clouds at
altitude can help reflect the heat, but I want to know … where does
that reflected heat go? … Are we being told here that reflected heat is
not damaging at all, but direct heat is? It seems to me that, if we had
‘global warming’, wouldn’t we want dark roofs to absorb the heat?”
Christopher Monckton replies.
|
|
Last Updated on Sunday, 07 June 2009 19:34 |
|
Read more... [Global Warming," Painting Your Roof White, and the Chattanooga Chu-Chu]
|
|
|
Written by Christopher Monckton
|
|
Friday, 05 June 2009 04:59 |
|
The day before yesterday they called it “global warming”. Yesterday they called it “climate change”. Today they call it “energy security”. Tomorrow they will call it what it is – absolute rubbish.
|
|
Last Updated on Friday, 05 June 2009 05:01 |
|
Read more... [Climate Conspiracy]
|
|
Written by Christopher Monckton
|
|
Monday, 25 May 2009 08:35 |
|
Science is not, repeat not, done by “consensus”, though politics is. The IPCC process, which aims at and then falsely claims “consensus”, is an explicitly political process, and not a scientific one.
|
|
Last Updated on Monday, 25 May 2009 08:40 |
|
Read more... ['Unequivocal' 'Consensus' on 'Global Warming']
|
|
|
Written by Christopher Monckton
|
|
Monday, 25 May 2009 08:35 |
|
Science is not, repeat not, done by “consensus”, though politics is. The IPCC process, which aims at and then falsely claims “consensus”, is an explicitly political process, and not a scientific one.
|
|
Last Updated on Monday, 25 May 2009 08:40 |
|
Read more... ['Unequivocal' 'Consensus' on 'Global Warming']
|
|
Written by Christopher Monckton
|
|
Monday, 18 May 2009 14:49 |
|
A simple, robust metric to analyze the cost-effectiveness of measures
to mitigate anthropogenic CO2 emissions, expressed not – as now – in
tonnes of CO2 emission foregone but in Kelvin degrees of warming
prevented, is described, evaluated, and applied to various
currently-proposed mitigation policies, all of which prove
disproportionately costly and ineffective
|
|
Last Updated on Monday, 18 May 2009 14:53 |
|
Read more... [Why Waxman/Markey Won't Work: A cost-effectiveness metric for CO2 mitigation policies]
|
|
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>
|
|
Page 7 of 24 |