|
Monday, 08 June 2009 |
|
Steven Chu, entertainingly described as an “Energy Secretary”, says we can Save the
Planet from “global warming” by painting our rooftops and roads white.
He says making roofs and roads paler would have the same effect as
taking every automobile in the world off the road for 11 years.
Rush Limbaugh, entertainingly as always, but pointedly, asks –
“Now, would somebody explain to me how he knows this? …
If we can do something that will effectively remove the carbon
emissions of every car on the road for 11 years, then why are we doing
anything else? Why are we doing cap and trade? Why are we getting rid
of SUVs? … How much paint is this going to take, by the way? How much of a footprint does paint manufacturing leave? … I
need a scientist to answer this for me. I understand how clouds at
altitude can help reflect the heat, but I want to know … where does
that reflected heat go? … Are we being told here that reflected heat is
not damaging at all, but direct heat is? It seems to me that, if we had
‘global warming’, wouldn’t we want dark roofs to absorb the heat?”
Christopher Monckton replies.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Monday, 08 June 2009 |
|
Steven Chu, entertainingly described as an “Energy Secretary”, says we can Save the
Planet from “global warming” by painting our rooftops and roads white.
He says making roofs and roads paler would have the same effect as
taking every automobile in the world off the road for 11 years.
Rush Limbaugh, entertainingly as always, but pointedly, asks –
“Now, would somebody explain to me how he knows this? …
If we can do something that will effectively remove the carbon
emissions of every car on the road for 11 years, then why are we doing
anything else? Why are we doing cap and trade? Why are we getting rid
of SUVs? … How much paint is this going to take, by the way? How much of a footprint does paint manufacturing leave? … I
need a scientist to answer this for me. I understand how clouds at
altitude can help reflect the heat, but I want to know … where does
that reflected heat go? … Are we being told here that reflected heat is
not damaging at all, but direct heat is? It seems to me that, if we had
‘global warming’, wouldn’t we want dark roofs to absorb the heat?”
Christopher Monckton replies.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Christopher Monckton
|
|
Friday, 05 June 2009 |
|
The day before yesterday they called it “global warming”. Yesterday they called it “climate change”. Today they call it “energy security”. Tomorrow they will call it what it is – absolute rubbish.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Christopher Monckton
|
|
Monday, 25 May 2009 |
|
Science is not, repeat not, done by “consensus”, though politics is. The IPCC process, which aims at and then falsely claims “consensus”, is an explicitly political process, and not a scientific one.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Christopher Monckton
|
|
Monday, 25 May 2009 |
|
Science is not, repeat not, done by “consensus”, though politics is. The IPCC process, which aims at and then falsely claims “consensus”, is an explicitly political process, and not a scientific one.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>
|
| Results 26 - 30 of 114 |