Monckton Collection
APOCALYPSE? NO! The Stern Report — Bad Economics based on Bad Science E-mail
Written by Viscount Monckton of Brenchley   
Thursday, 19 July 2007 07:08
Politicians, scientists and bureaucrats have contrived a threat of Biblical floods, droughts, plagues and extinctions worthier of St. John the Divine than of science.
Last Updated on Monday, 23 July 2007 07:32
Read more... [APOCALYPSE? NO! The Stern Report — Bad Economics based on Bad Science]
 
Errors in Al Gore’s An Inconvenient Truth E-mail
Written by Viscount Monckton of Brenchley   
Thursday, 19 July 2007 06:55
Introduction: A cursory examination of the list of Gore’s errors is enough to demonstrate that each of them serves to magnify the supposed planetary threat posed by “global warming”, or to pour scorn and contempt on any who dare to gainsay the supposed “consensus”. Therefore we must conclude that Gore’s movie was not science: it was sophisticated propaganda that relied upon the ignorance of his cinema-going audiences and the fawning acquiescence of news media whose editorial and political predisposition was in any event in favor of presenting his Apocalyptic version of climate change regardless of the fact that at so many points central to his argument his presentation was fundamentally false.
Last Updated on Monday, 23 July 2007 07:32
Read more... [Errors in Al Gore’s An Inconvenient Truth]
 
The Mathematical Reason Why Long-run Climatic prediction is Impossible E-mail
Written by Viscount Monckton of Brenchley   
Thursday, 19 July 2007 05:25
CLIMATE cannot be accurately predicted more than a few weeks ahead with any respectable degree of reliability. The unpredictability even of a simple mathematical object whose initial state is not known in sufficiently fine detail has long been proven. Climate is a complex, non-linear object (IPCC, 2001) and is, therefore, a fortiori, impossible to predict long-term.
Last Updated on Monday, 23 July 2007 07:32
Read more... [The Mathematical Reason Why Long-run Climatic prediction is Impossible]
 
Rebuttal of “Rebuttal of ‘On global forces of nature driving the Earth’s Climate E-mail
Written by Viscount Monckton of Brenchley   
Thursday, 19 July 2007 05:12

In a recent paper, W. Aeschbach-Hertig (2006) of the Institute of Environmental Physics in the University of Heidelberg promotes his view that Khilyuk and Chilingar (2006) are wrong to suggest that the human influence on climate is negligible compared to natural forces driving the Earth’s climate. The two authors are members of the Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Southern California. We shall consider his criticisms of Khilyuk and Chilingar’s paper seriatim, after first summarizing the paper itself.

Last Updated on Monday, 23 July 2007 07:32
Read more... [Rebuttal of “Rebuttal of ‘On global forces of nature driving the Earth’s Climate]
 
IPCC Fourth Assessment Report 2007, Initial Analysis and Summary E-mail
Written by Viscount Monckton of Brenchley   
Thursday, 19 July 2007 04:38

FIGURES in the final draft of the UN’s fourth five-year report on climate change show that the previous report, in 2001, had overestimated the human influence on the climate since the Industrial Revolution by at least one-third.

Last Updated on Monday, 23 July 2007 07:32
Read more... [IPCC Fourth Assessment Report 2007, Initial Analysis and Summary]
 
<< Start < Prev 21 22 23 24 Next > End >>

Page 23 of 24