|
Written by the Viscount Monckton of Brenchley
|
|
Wednesday, 23 December 2009 05:40 |
|
How is it that anyone, even for an instant, can seriously imagine that the doubling of today’s CO2 concentration that the IPCC predicts for this century will have a major and potentially catastrophic influence over the climate? Humankind is too insignificant to make any real difference to global temperature, as anyone with a sense of due proportion can see at once.
The ancient Greeks had a nifty aphorism – panta metrios. This means, “All things in due proportion”. Every great civilization has a sense of due proportion: every failing civilization loses it. Our classe politique, worldwide, has lost it big-time
|
|
Last Updated on Wednesday, 23 December 2009 05:55 |
|
Read more... [A Sense of Due Proportion]
|
|
|
Written by The Viscount Monckton of Brenchley
|
|
Tuesday, 22 December 2009 08:12 |
|
An Australian reader has sent in a question-and-answer sheet on the
climate completed by Dr. Andrew Glikson on behalf of a Member of
Parliament who believes “global warming” is a global crisis and has
circulated Dr. Glikson’s document to her constituents. The reader has
asked us to provide a commentary on Dr. Glikson’s answers, which we do
with pleasure.
|
|
Last Updated on Tuesday, 22 December 2009 08:52 |
|
Read more... [A Non-Problem Spun Up Into A Global Crisis]
|
|
Written by The Viscount Monckton of Brenchley
|
|
Tuesday, 22 December 2009 08:12 |
|
An Australian reader has sent in a question-and-answer sheet on the
climate completed by Dr. Andrew Glikson on behalf of a Member of
Parliament who believes “global warming” is a global crisis and has
circulated Dr. Glikson’s document to her constituents. The reader has
asked us to provide a commentary on Dr. Glikson’s answers, which we do
with pleasure.
|
|
Last Updated on Tuesday, 22 December 2009 08:52 |
|
Read more... [A Non-Problem Spun Up Into A Global Crisis]
|
|
|
Written by The Viscount Monckton of Brenchley
|
|
Tuesday, 22 December 2009 07:46 |
|
Recently an enquirer wrote to a Doctor of Science who is a true-believer in the “global warming” theory, and drew his attention to some of my conclusions to the effect that the science is not as settled as we are being told. The Doctor replied with an ad-hominem attack on me, but also included some scientific argument. Here, I respond to that argument, giving an outline of the reasons why the official version of the science may be doubtful.
|
|
Last Updated on Tuesday, 22 December 2009 08:10 |
|
Read more... [Science Ad Rem, Not Politics Ad Hominem]
|
|
Written by Christopher Monckton
|
|
Thursday, 17 December 2009 13:50 |
|
|
|
Last Updated on Thursday, 17 December 2009 14:03 |
|
Read more... [SPPI Monthly CO2 Report: November]
|
|
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>
|
|
Page 2 of 24 |
