|
Written by Christopher Monckton
|
|
Wednesday, 29 April 2009 14:25 |
|
Clark Hoyt, Esq., Public Editor and Readers’ Representative, The New York Times.
Dear Mr. Hoyt,
Deliberate misrepresentation in a front-page article by Andrew Revkin on Friday, 24 April, 2009
The New York Times guidelines for staff writers on “Journalistic
Ethics” begin by stating the principles that all journalists should
respect: impartiality and neutrality; integrity; and avoidance of
conflicts of interest. Andrew Revkin’s front-page article on Friday, 24
April, 2009, falsely alleging that a coalition of energy corporations
had for many years acted like tobacco corporations, misrepresenting
advice from its own scientists about the supposed threat of “global
warming,” offends grievously against all of these principles.
|
|
Last Updated on Wednesday, 29 April 2009 14:32 |
|
Read more... [Deliberate Misrepresentation Letter of formal complaint to Clark Hoyt, Esq. Public Editor of NYTimes]
|
|
|
Written by Michael Berliner
|
|
Wednesday, 22 April 2009 15:00 |
|
EARTH DAY approaches, and with it a grave danger faces mankind. The
danger is not from acid rain, global warming, smog, or the logging of
rain forests, as environmentalists would have us believe. The danger to
mankind is from environmentalism.
The fundamental goal of environmentalism is not clean air and clean
water; rather, it is the demolition of technological/industrial
civilization. Environmentalism's goal is not the advancement of human
health, human happiness, and human life; rather, it is a subhuman world
where "nature" is worshipped like the totem of some primitive religion.
|
|
Last Updated on Thursday, 23 April 2009 09:48 |
|
Read more... [The Danger of Environmentalism]
|
|
Friday, 17 April 2009 04:50 |
|
By Bjorn Lomborg | April 15, 2009
ACCORDING to conventional wisdom, we are voraciously using the world's
resources and living way beyond Earth's means. This narrative of
decline and pessimism underlies much of today's environmental discourse
and is often formulated in a simple fashion: by 2030, we will need two
planets to sustain us, owing to higher living standards and population
growth. If everyone managed to live at American living standards today,
we would need almost five planets. But this received wisdom is
fundamentally wrong.
Environmental campaigners use the so-called ecological footprint -
how much area each one of us requires from the planet - to make their
point.
|
|
Last Updated on Friday, 17 April 2009 05:14 |
|
Read more... [No, We Don't Need Five Planets]
|
|
|
Tuesday, 14 April 2009 11:39 |
|
Written by Farmer Steve
I have changed my mind about participating in the carbon credit
program. And have resolved to give the money I received to St Jude’s
Children’s Hospital.
Here is why.
Recently I sat in the fire hall with a few dozen farmers. We had been invited to hear how we can get paid for carbon credits.
The speaker explained how their satellites can measure the carbon in
our land individually and how much money we could get. Then asked for
questions.
I asked “what is the source of this money”?
|
|
Last Updated on Tuesday, 14 April 2009 12:21 |
|
Read more... [A Farmer's View On Carbon Credits]
|
|
Written by F. James Sensenbrenner Jr.
|
|
Monday, 13 April 2009 21:30 |
|
Carbon caps or levies will throttle taxpayers
Last
summer, China and the developing world announced the price for their
cooperation on a global-warming treaty: up to 1% of the developed
world's gross domestic product. For the U.S., this would mean sending
$140 billion a year to China, Iran, North Korea and Cuba, among other
countries. This is in addition to the $28 billion we already distribute
each year in foreign aid.
For a U.S. family of four, China's demand comes to nearly $1,900 in yearly taxes. And that's just the beginning.
The
tenor of international climate negotiations has emboldened the Indian
government to claim in a February filing with the United Nations that
the West owes it billions of dollars in compensation for climate
change. These payments, it said, should be mandatory and not "subject
to decisions of developed country governments and legislatures."
|
|
Last Updated on Thursday, 16 April 2009 12:35 |
|
Read more... [Technology is the Answer to Climate Change]
|
|
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next > End >>
|
|
Page 20 of 34 |