|
Written by Mitch Daniels
|
|
Monday, 18 May 2009 08:05 |
|
This week Congress is set to release the details of the Waxman-Markey American Clean Energy and Security Act, a bill that purports to combat global warming by setting strict limits on carbon emissions. I'm not a candidate for any office – now or ever again – and I've approached the "climate change" debate with an open-mind. But it's clear to me that the nation, and in particular Indiana, my home state, will be terribly disserved by this cap-and-trade policy on the verge of passage in the House.
|
|
Last Updated on Monday, 18 May 2009 08:21 |
|
Read more... [Indiana Says 'No Thanks' to Cap and Trade]
|
|
|
Written by Chip Knappenberger
|
|
Friday, 15 May 2009 12:54 |
|
Editor Note: Using mainstream models and assumptions, Mr. Knappenberger
finds that in the year 2050 with a 83% emissions reduction (the
aspirational goal of Waxman-Markey, the beginning steps of which are
under vigorous debate), the temperature reduction is nine hundredths of
one degree Fahrenheit, or two years of avoided warming. A more
realistic climate bill would be a fraction of this amount. The author
will respond to technical questions on methodology and results and
invites input on alternative scenarios and analyses.
|
|
Last Updated on Friday, 15 May 2009 13:15 |
|
Read more... [The Non-Climatic Impacts of theWaxman-Markey Mitigation Bill]
|
|
Wednesday, 13 May 2009 13:56 |
|
Obama's Energy Triangulation
by Joel Kotkin | May 12, 2009
With the possible exception of health care reform, no major issue
presents more political opportunities and potential pitfalls for
President Barack Obama than energy. A misstep over energy policy could
cause serious economic, social and political consequences that could
continue over the next decade.
To succeed in revising American energy policy, the president will need
to try to triangulate three different priorities: energy security,
environmental protection and the need for economic growth. Right now,
the administration would like to think it could have all three, but
these concerns often collide more than they align.
|
|
Last Updated on Wednesday, 13 May 2009 14:00 |
|
Read more... [Obama's Energy Triangulation]
|
|
|
Written by Christopher Monckton
|
|
Tuesday, 12 May 2009 06:27 |
|
Yet again Gavin Schmidt, who writes the political RealClimate blog for
“global-warming” alarmists that is promoted by two of the authors of
the now-discredited “hockey-stick” graph falsely abolishing the
medieval warm period, has inaccurately criticized me in his blog. This
paper sets the facts straight.
|
|
Last Updated on Tuesday, 12 May 2009 06:30 |
|
Read more... [Chuck It Yet Again Schmidt!]
|
|
Thursday, 30 April 2009 15:46 |
|
Al Gore, Global Warming and Truth
by Thomas Fuller | April 27, 2009
I voted three times for Al Gore, twice for VP and once for President. I don't regret the first two votes...
The former Vice President spoke before the House Energy and Commerce
Committee last week. It was not his shining hour. Some of what he said
was hyperbole. Some of what he said is just not true. And he, or one of
his staff, should surely have known the limits he was transgressing.
For example, when speaking about Arctic ice, he said this:
|
|
Last Updated on Thursday, 30 April 2009 15:59 |
|
Read more... [Al Gore, Global Warming and Truth]
|
|
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next > End >>
|
|
Page 19 of 34 |