Commentaries & Essays
Nancy Pelosi's Giant Carbon Footprint Print E-mail
Written by Paul C. Knappenberger   
Thursday, 26 May 2011 00:00

A few months ago Judicial Watch, which describes itself as a “a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, [which] promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law” summarized the results of its Freedom of Information request for records concerning Nancy Pelosi’s use of Air Force aircraft for her transportation while Speaker of the House.



Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Free and Open Source Software News Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! Twitter! Joomla Free PHP
Last Updated on Thursday, 26 May 2011 12:43
Read more... [Nancy Pelosi's Giant Carbon Footprint]
 
"3 Billion and Counting" New Film Challenges DDT Myths and Lies that have caused Millions of Needless Deaths. Print E-mail
Written by Paul Driessen   
Wednesday, 15 September 2010 17:52

We will eradicate malaria by 2010, stricken families were promised a few years ago. Well, 2010 is nearly gone and, instead of eradication, we have more malaria than before … and a new target date: 2015. Unless malaria control policies change, that date too will come and go. Billions will still be at risk of getting malaria. Hundreds of millions will continue getting the disease. Millions will die or become permanently brain-damaged. And poverty and misery will continue ravaging Third World communities.



Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Free and Open Source Software News Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! Twitter! Joomla Free PHP
Last Updated on Wednesday, 15 September 2010 17:58
Read more... [3 Billion and Counting" New Film Challenges DDT Myths and Lies that have caused Millions of Needless Deaths.]
 
They Do Protest Too Much Print E-mail
Written by Christopher Monckton of Brenchley   
Monday, 16 August 2010 18:44

SPPI’s authoritative Monthly CO2 Reports have been providing hard, real-world data about changes in CO2 concentration, temperature, sea ice, hurricane activity, and many other climate indicators for two years. These regular reports, now widely cited on television, in universities, and in Congress, have proven highly embarrassing to climate extremists. Our graphs show that the climate is responding normally, and that neither CO2 concentration nor temperature is rising anything like as fast as the UN’s climate panel had predicted.  Now the extremists are seeking to dismiss our CO2 concentration and temperature graphs as incorrect in various respects. This short note answers some of the inappropriate criticisms currently circulating on the extremist blogs.



Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Free and Open Source Software News Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! Twitter! Joomla Free PHP
Last Updated on Monday, 16 August 2010 18:50
Read more... [They Do Protest Too Much]
 
A Review of James Hansen's Book: "Storms of My Grandchildren..." Print E-mail
Written by Jim Hollingsworth   
Sunday, 04 July 2010 09:48

While scientists the world over continue to study and debate what part man has played (if any) in the gentle warming that took place mainly in the latter half of the last century, Dr. James Hansen is absolutely certain.  The purpose of his book is to scare us into taking immediate and drastic action to control greenhouse gases, mainly carbon dioxide.  Although Dr. Hansen is a scientist, his work is more political than scientific.  He makes an emotional appeal and he does it by attempting to build fear that there will be no world left for our grandchildren to live in.



Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Free and Open Source Software News Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! Twitter! Joomla Free PHP
Last Updated on Monday, 12 July 2010 09:47
Read more... [A Review of James Hansen's Book: "Storms of My Grandchildren...]
 
Warming or Cooling? Print E-mail
Written by David C. Archibald   
Wednesday, 09 June 2010 00:10

The first thing to be aware of is that the warming effect of carbon dioxide is strongly logarithmic. Of the 3° C. that carbon dioxide contributes to the greenhouse effect, the first 20 ppm has a greater effect than the following 400 ppm. By the time we get to the current level of 384 ppm, each 100 ppm increment will produce only about 0.1° of warming. With atmospheric carbon dioxide rising at about 2 ppm per annum, temperature will rise at 0.1° every 50 years. If that is true, you will ask, how does the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) get its icecap-melting figure of 5° for doubling of the preindustrial level to 560 ppm?



Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Free and Open Source Software News Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! Twitter! Joomla Free PHP
Read more... [Warming or Cooling?]
 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>

Page 1 of 34