Category Archives: Monckton

Climate Sensitivity Reconsidered

By | September 12, 2008

Abstract The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC, 2007) concluded that anthropogenic CO2 emissions probably caused more than half of the “global warming” of the past 50 years and would cause further rapid warming. However, global mean surface temperature TS has not risen since 1998 and may have fallen since late 2001. The present analysis suggests that the… Read More »

Response to Author Smith’s Critique of Christopher Monckton’s “Climate Sensitivity Reconsidered”

By | August 4, 2008

"In the July 2008 edition of Physics and Society, a paper by Christopher Monckton entitled Climate Sensitivity Reconsidered caused considerable interest when the Society, which had invited Monckton to submit the paper and then published it, decided a week after publication, and without Monckton’s knowledge or consent, to add a prefatory disclaimer to the paper.

“Chuck it Again Schmidt!”

By | July 29, 2008

For the second time, the FalseClimate propaganda blog, founded by two co-authors of the now-discredited “hockey-stick” graph by which the UN’s climate panel tried unsuccessfully to abolish the mediaeval warm period, has launched a malevolent, scientifically-illiterate, and unscientifically-ad-hominem attack on a publication by me. My 8000-word paper, Climate Sensitivity Reconsidered, was published in Physics and Society in July… Read More »

Lord Monckton’s Letter to Dr. Bienenstock

By | July 19, 2008

Lord Monckton’s letter of protest to the President of the American Physical Society over the false statement that Monckton’s paper critical of the UN’s estimates for climate sensitivity for a doubling of atmospheric CO2 was not peer-reviewed. Christopher Monckton, who once advised Margaret Thatcher, demonstrates via 30 equations that computer models used by the UN’s climate panel (IPCC)… Read More »

Has the IPCC inflated the feedback factor?

By | April 10, 2008

In the IPCC’s methodology, climate sensitivity ?T? to radiative forcing is the product of three factors: Tropopausal radiative forcing, the no-feedbacks climate sensitivity parameter, and the feedback multiplier.

“Climate Target is not radical enough”

By | April 8, 2008

Nasa scientist warns the world must urgently make huge CO2 reductions Ed Pilkington, The Guardian, Monday, 7 April, 2008. Commentary by Christopher Monckton The scare: One of the world’s leading climate scientists warns today that the EU and its international partners must urgently rethink targets for cutting carbon dioxide in the atmosphere because of fears they have grossly… Read More »

“Climate Target is not radical enough”

By | April 8, 2008

Nasa scientist warns the world must urgently make huge CO2 reductions Ed Pilkington, The Guardian, Monday, 7 April, 2008. Commentary by Christopher Monckton The scare: One of the world’s leading climate scientists warns today that the EU and its international partners must urgently rethink targets for cutting carbon dioxide in the atmosphere because of fears they have grossly… Read More »

Global Warming Profiteers Are Wrong

By | April 4, 2008

Climate alarmists are alarmed, scaremongers scared, for their predictions of catastrophe are not coming true. "Global warming" has stopped. For 10 years, average temperatures on earth have not risen. For seven years, the trend has been downward. The fall between January 2007 and January 2008 was the biggest since records began in 1880.